Size:
4
Pay in installments of $6.66 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 28 - Jul 3
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
cotton dresses vintage 1980s LAURA ASHLEY Floral Cotton DressD E T A I L S 1980s dress fit + flare shape cotton floral print (peony flower perhaps?) black, pink, peach, purple, green scoop neckline in front + plunging v neckline in back puff sleeves with pleated detail for added fullness princess seams nipped natural waist lightly dropped basque waist big bow decorates back of waist gathered full almost circle skirt one in seam hip pocket nylon side zipper bodice lined in self fabric, skirt is unlined label:
D E T A I L S• 1980s dress
• fit + flare shape
• cotton
• floral print (peony flower perhaps?)
• black, pink, peach, purple, green
• scoop neckline in front + plunging v-neckline in back
• puff sleeves with pleated detail for added fullness
• princess seams
• nipped natural waist
• lightly dropped basque waist
• big bow decorates back of waist
• gathered full almost-circle skirt
• one in-seam hip pocket
• nylon side zipper
• bodice lined in self fabric, skirt is unlined
• label: Laura Ashley
Belt is used for styling purposes and is not included with the dress.
M E A S U R E M E N T S
fits like a: small | medium
shoulders: 14"
bust: 36-38"
waist: 30"
hips: free
length: 49.5"
bodice length: 16" (to natural waist)
sleeve length: 13"
skirt sweep: 158"
C O N D I T I O N
Excellent vintage condition. No issues to note and ready to wear!
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 648 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Good for wide or fat baby feet
Size: 18-24 Months Toddler, Color: Mariposa White Leather
Perfect fit for babies with wider chubbier feet easy for them to learn how to walk in with the leather soles also cute
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 24, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Way too big
Size: 6-9 Months Infant, Color: Mariposa White Leather
Adorable but sizing is WAY off. These are massive and look like toddler shoes on our (tall and bigger footed) 7 month old.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Cute but flimsy soles
Size: 9-12 Months Infant, Color: Mariposa Light Pink Leather, Size: 9-12 Months Infant, Color: Mariposa Light Pink Leather
I wanted to love these because they're the few leather options out there. Unfortunately, the soles are made of a flimsy material that came apart after less than 2 weeks of wear. Not sure how long they'll last...
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 21, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Fits like a sock
We bought these for the Florida beaches, not knowing whether our beach would have debris, shells, or the common straw sticking up to assault your feet! We bought them for our one year old and she loved them. The sole is thin and moveable, but still protected her feet. Our beach ended up being pristine and clean, so she didn’t really need them. We let her wear them at home in the grass because she was that obsessed with them. Nice product and we’d buy them again, if needed!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Favorite Robezz shoe style
These are great, flexible sole that is a step up from the leather soles. This is a rubber gripper sole that protects the foot but gives great moment for new walkers! The fabric was better in person than I expected.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026